Can an RTX 4070 Ti SUPER run GLM 4.7 Flash?

No

Only barely. It loads at IQ3_XXS, which compresses the weights far enough to visibly degrade the model, so the honest answer is that this pairing does not work.

The numbers

GLM 4.7 Flash has 31.22 billion parameters across 47 layers, of which 3.66 billion are read for each token. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of VRAM at 672 GB/s, of which about 15.2 GB is left for a model once the operating system has taken its share.

QuantisationTotal neededFitsSpeed
Q8_0 32.03 GB no
Q6_K 24.98 GB no
Q5_K_M 21.82 GB no
Q4_K_M 18.69 GB no
IQ4_XS 16.59 GB no
Q3_K_M 15.35 GB no
IQ3_XXS degraded 12.26 GB yes 321 t/s
Q2_K degraded 13.31 GB yes 299.4 t/s
IQ2_XXS degraded 8.63 GB yes 426.9 t/s

3 of the 9 levels fit. Levels marked degraded are listed for completeness, not as advice.

What to do instead

Shortening the context window will not rescue this one: at 4k it still wants 18.42 GB against 18.69 GB at 8k, because the weights rather than the cache are what fill the card. The gap here is too large for settings to close.

Or the hardware that does run it

The cheapest device we track that runs GLM 4.7 Flash at a quantisation worth using is the Radeon RX 7900 XT, around $650 , running it at Q4_K_M at about 233.1 tokens per second. Check the current price (affiliate link; indicative price reviewed 2026-09-01). Compare every option.

See how fast it feels

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER running GLM 4.7 Flash at IQ3_XXS

Wait for the first word56 ms
Then writes at321 tok/s
Whole answer595 ms

YouWhy does my model use more memory when the conversation gets longer?

Model

Because of the KV cache. Every token you send leaves behind a key and a value vector in each layer of the model, and those stay in memory for as long as the conversation lasts.

The weights are a fixed cost: load a 4-bit 8B model and that is about 4.8 GB, whether you write one word or ten thousand. The cache is the part that grows, and it grows in a straight line with the number of tokens in the window.

How steeply depends on the model's attention design. With grouped-query attention, several query heads share one key-value pair, which cuts the cache by that ratio. Without it, every head keeps its own, and a long context can cost more memory than the weights themselves.

If you are short on memory, the first thing to try is lowering the context window in your runtime, not the quantisation.

Simulated from our estimate at a 512-token question, not a recording. Assumes nothing else is competing for the GPU. The same answer on RTX 4090 at Q5_K_M would take about 624 ms.

Keep going

Everything the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER runs, the full breakdown for GLM 4.7 Flash, or check a different pairing in the calculator.