Can an RTX 4060 Ti 16GB run Gemma 4 31B Instruct?

Barely

It only loads at IQ3_XXS, which compresses the weights far enough to visibly degrade the model, so we would not call that running it.

In practice

It loads, and we would not call that running it. The only quantization that fits the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is IQ3_XXS, which compresses the weights far enough that Gemma 4 31B Instruct loses a visible amount of its ability, so we do not recommend it. At Q4_K_M it needs 21.31 GB against the 15.2 GB available.

Running it properly means a split with system RAM: at Q4_K_M about 42 of 60 layers fit on the card, and the estimate falls to 3.6 tokens per second. A smaller model at a proper quantization is a better answer than a larger one squeezed in, and the next section lists the ones that fit.

The numbers

Gemma 4 31B Instruct has 31.27 billion parameters across 60 layers. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB of VRAM at 288 GB/s, of which about 15.2 GB is left for a model once the operating system has taken its share.

QuantizationTotal neededFitsSpeed
Q8_0 34.67 GB partial 1.4 t/s
Q6_K 27.61 GB partial 2.0 t/s
Q5_K_M 24.44 GB partial 2.6 t/s
Q4_K_M 21.31 GB partial 3.6 t/s
IQ4_XS 19.2 GB partial 4.9 t/s
Q3_K_M 17.96 GB partial 6.0 t/s
IQ3_XXS degraded 14.87 GB yes 14.7 t/s
Q2_K degraded 15.93 GB partial 10.5 t/s
IQ2_XXS degraded 11.23 GB yes 19.7 t/s

2 of the 9 levels fit entirely. Levels marked degraded are listed for completeness, not as advice. Rows marked partial or experts in RAM run with part of the model in system RAM, at the speed shown.

What to run instead

A smaller model from the same family is the straightforward answer. These fit on an RTX 4060 Ti 16GB at a quantization worth using:

Shortening the context will not rescue this one: at 4k it still wants 20.06 GB against 21.31 GB at 8k, because the weights, not the cache, are what fill the card.

Models of this size are what a second GPU or a large-memory machine is for. The multi-GPU guide shows what 2 cards add, and the Mac and PC comparison shows where unified memory holds a model that no single card can.

Or the hardware that does run it

The cheapest device we track that runs Gemma 4 31B Instruct at a quantization worth using is the GeForce RTX 3090, around $700 used , running it at Q4_K_M at about 33.0 tokens per second. Check the current price (affiliate link, indicative price reviewed 2026-09-01). Compare every option.

What else an RTX 4060 Ti 16GB runs well

For comparison, these are the other popular models that fit this device at a sound quantization, best pairings first.

ModelQuantizationMemorySpeed
GPT OSS 20B MXFP4 11.55 GB 51.5 t/s
Qwen3.5 27B IQ4_XS 14.2 GB 15.4 t/s
Qwen3.5 9B Q8_0 9.25 GB 24.0 t/s
Qwen3 14B Q6_K 12.38 GB 17.8 t/s

The same model on nearby hardware

Memory decides whether Gemma 4 31B Instruct loads and bandwidth decides how quickly it answers. Here is what a step down, a card with the same memory and a step up do with it.

DeviceMemoryBandwidthResult
GeForce RTX 4070 12 GB 504 GB/s partial, 2.7 t/s
GeForce RTX 5080 16 GB 960 GB/s does not fit
GeForce RTX 4090 24 GB 1008 GB/s Q4_K_M, 35.5 t/s

Questions people ask

How much VRAM does Gemma 4 31B Instruct need on RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?

At Q4_K_M with an 8k context window it needs 21.31 GB in total: 17.58 GB of weights, 3.28 GB of KV cache and 0.45 GB of runtime overhead. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB makes about 15.2 GB available once the operating system has taken its share.

What should I run instead of Gemma 4 31B Instruct on RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?

Gemma 3 27B Instruct fits at IQ4_XS and runs at about 14.5 tokens per second. Smaller models from the same family are the usual answer.

Keep going

Everything the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB runs, the full breakdown for Gemma 4 31B Instruct, how the numbers are made in the methodology, or a different pairing in the calculator.